Hanson et al v. Metzger et al, No. 4:2010cv00005 - Document 18 (D. Mont. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 11 Findings and Recommendations, and 15 Findings and Recommendations. 1) Plaintiff Jane Doe is DISMISSED as party in this case; 2) Plaintiff Michael Hanson's federal claims are DISMISSED with p rejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; 3) The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff Hanson's state law claims; 4) No further amendments of the Complaint will be allowed as they would be futile; 5) Any appeal from this disposition will not be taken in good faith as Plaintiff Hanson's claims are frivolous. Copy of Order mailed to Plaintiff Hanson. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/6/2010. (SLR, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hanson et al v. Metzger et al Doc. 18 2010 APR 6 flIT! 11 56 , .", .'., l,' LY _________._ __ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT () EF; T'( CLE;o,,, FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION MICHAEL LEE HANSON, Plaintiff, No. CV-10-05-GF-SEH vs. ORDER LINDA METZGER, et aI., Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered Findings and Recommendations in this matter on February 17, 2010/ and on March 11, 2010. 2 Plaintiff filed objections on March 2,2010/ and on March 25, 2010. 4 The Court reviews de novo findings and recommendations to which objections are made. 28 U.S.c. § 636(b)(1). I Document No. II 2 Document No. 15 1 Document No. 12 4 Document No. 16 Dockets.Justia.com Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff Jane Doe is DISMISSED as party in this case. 2. Plaintiff Michael Hanson's federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 3. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff Hanson's state law claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). 4. No further amendments of the Complaint will be allowed as they would be futile. 5. Any appeal from this disposition will not be taken in good faith as Plaintiff Hanson's claims are frivolous. Fed. R. App. P. 24(aX3). 6. The Clerk is DATED this 5 to enter judgment accordingly. day of April, 2010. United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
