Gerard v. Astrue, No. 4:2009cv00035 - Document 23 (D. Mont. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 21 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 1/14/2010. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 1/14/2010. (SLR, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Gerard v. Astrue Doc. 23 r- • ' t- I , " , ,,' !, , IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT CQP. .!lT, FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION TANA L. GERARD, Plaintiff, No. CV-09-35-GF-SEH vs. ORDER MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered his Findings and Recommendations l on January 7, 2010. Plaintiff filed objections on January 12,2010. The Court reviews de novo findings and recommendations to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon de novo review ofthe record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. I Document No. 21 Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgmene is DENIED. 2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgmenf is GRANTED. 3. The Clerk is DATED this / If to enter judgment accordingly. January, 2010. United States District Judge 2 Document No. 14 3 Document No. 17 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
