Copelton v. Correctional Corporation of America et al, No. 4:2009cv00019 - Document 85 (D. Mont. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 82 in full. 72 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Piper Heinrich, Carol Bowen is GRANTED. The Court sua sponte grants summary judgment in favor of Defendant Warden Sam Law and Defendant Crossroads Co rrectional Center with respect to all remaining claims against them. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. Any appeal from this disposition will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 12/1/2010. Mailed to Copelton. (TAG, )

Download PDF
Copelton v. Correctional Corporation of America et al Doc. 85 f ," IN THE UNITED STATES DIStrRIC­;rCO:UllY­­" . '. ,. ,.,\ FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION JOHN O. COPEL ON, T Plaintiff, No. CV­09­19­GF­SEH vs. ORDER CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF AMERlCA, et aI, Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered his Findings and Recommendations' in this matter on November 5, 2010. Plaintiff filed objections on November 24,2010. 2 The Court reviews de novo findings and recommendations to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. , Document No. 82 2 Document No. 84 Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED: 1. Defendant Carol Bowen and Defendant Piper Heinrich's Motion for Summary Judgment" is GRANTED. 2. The Court sua sponte grants summary judgment in favor of Defendant Warden Sam Law and Defendant Crossroads COlTectional Center with respect to all remaining claims against them. 3. Plaintiffs Complainrl is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. 5. Any appeal from this disposition will not be taken in good faith as the claims asserted in the DATED this / are frivolous. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). of December, 2010. United States District Judge 2 Document No. 72 3 Document No.2 -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.