Copelton v. Correctional Corporation of America et al, No. 4:2009cv00019 - Document 53 (D. Mont. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 46 in full. Defendant Warden Sam Law and Defendant Correction Corporation of America's 24 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims for Injunctive and/or Declaratory Relief is GRANTED. All claims for injunctive and declaratory relief and all requests for criminal punishment are DISMISSED. Plaintiff's 40 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 5/25/2010. Mailed to Copelton. (TAG, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Copelton v. Correctional Corporation of America et al Doc. 53 ! , IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ., FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION JOHN O. COPELTON, Plaintiff, No. CV-09-19-GF-SEH vs. ORDER CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, et aI, Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered his Findings and Recommendations! in this matter on April 21, 2010. Plaintiff filed objections on April 29, 2010. The Court reviews de novo findings and recommendations to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. t Document No. 46 Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED: 1. Defendant Warden Sam Law and Defendant Correction Corporation of America's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims for Injunctive and/or Declaratory Relief is GRANTED. All claims for injunctive and declaratory relief and all requests for criminal punishment are DISMISSED. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment3 is DENIED. DATED this of May, 2010. United States District Judge 2 Document No. 24 3 Document No. 40 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
