Duncan v. U.S. President Robinette Biden et al, No. 1:2024cv00002 - Document 9 (D. Mont. 2024)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Cavan's 8 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 4/15/2024. (EMH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Duncan v. U.S. President Robinette Biden et al Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION ALVINJ.DUNCAN, CV 24-02-BLG-SPW Plaintiff, vs. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND U.S. PRESIDENT ROBINETTE RECOMMENDATIONS BIDEN,SHERIFF MIKE LINDER, SCOTT TWITO,State of Montana Prosecutor, Defendants. Before the Court are United States Magistrate Judge Timothy Cavan's Findings and Recommendations, filed March 29, 2024. (Doc. 8). Judge Cavan granted Plaintiff Alvin Duncan's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and recommended the Court dismiss the matter as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). {Id. at 5). Duncan was required to file written objection within 14 days ofthe filing of Judge Cavan's Findings and Recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). He did not object to the Findings and Recommendations, and so waived their right to de novo review of the record. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). This Court reviews for clear error those findings and recommendations to which no party objects. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach.,Inc.,656F.2d 1309,1313(9th Cir. 1981); Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
