Hedstrom v. Peters, No. 1:2022cv00081 - Document 34 (D. Mont. 2024)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL AND GRANTING 28 Motion for PARTIAL Summary Judgment filed by Keldah Elizabeth Hedstrom. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 3/4/2024. (AMC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hedstrom v. Peters Doc. 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION KELDAH ELIZABETH HEDSTROM, Individually and as the Natural Parent CV 22-81-BLG-SPW and Guardian of D.O.P., a Minor, Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS vs. CODY CLAY PETERS, Defendant. Before the Court are United States Magistrate Judge Kathleen DeSoto's Findings and Recommendations,filed February 14, 2024. (Doc. 33). Judge DeSoto recommended the Court grant Plaintiff Keldah Elizabeth Hedstrom's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Doc. 28). The parties were required to file written objections within 14 days ofthe filing ofJudge DeSoto's Findings and Recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Neither party objected to the Findings and Recommendations, and so waived their right to de novo review ofthe record. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). This Court reviews for clear error those findings and recommendations to which no party objects. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149(1985). Clear error exists if the Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
