Giacometto Ranch Inc. et al v. Denbury Onshore LLC. et al, No. 1:2016cv00145 - Document 89 (D. Mont. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered by the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 78) are ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Pa1iial SummaryJudgment (Doc. 50) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs' Rule 56(d) Motion (Doc. 60) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 11/12/2020. (EMH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Giacometto Ranch Inc. et al v. Denbury Onshore LLC. et al Doc. 89 IN TE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION FILED NOV 12 2020 GIACOETTO RANCH INC. a Montana Corporation, TOM GIACOETTO, a resident of Montana, and ROBERT GIACOETTO, a resident of South Dakota, CV 16-145-BLG-SPW Clerk, U S District Court District Of Montana Billigs ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMENDATIONS Plaintifs, vs. DENBURY ONSHORE LLC, a Delaware Coporation, and DENBURY OPERATING COPANY, a Delaware Coporation, Defendants. The United States Magistrate Judge iled Findings and Recommendations on July 15, 2020. (Doc. 78). The Magistrate recommended that Deendants' Motion or Partial Summay Judgment (Doc. 50) be granted and Plaintifs' Rule 56(d) Motion (Doc. 60) be denied. (Doc. 78 at 29). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(l), parties are required to ile written objections within 14 days of the iling of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation. No objections were iled. When neither party objects, this Court reviews the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation or clear error. 1 Dockets.Justia.com McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is let with a "definite and irm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000). After reviewing the Findings and Recommendation, this Court does not ind that the Magistrate committed clear error. IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered by the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 78) are ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Deendants' Motion or Pa1iial Summary Judgment (Doc. 50) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs' Rule 56(d) Motion (Doc. 60) is DENIED. DATED this Q of November, 2020. L _J- .WATTERS United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
