Proby v. Bullock et al, No. 4:2014cv01355 - Document 52 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

Court Description: OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before March 14, 2015, plaintiff shall provide the Court with the full name and address of defendant Christy Ramsey so that service may be effected. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action as to Christy Ramsey, without prejudice andwithout further notice. Response to Court due by 3/14/2015. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 2/17/15. (CLA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION GEORGE PROBY, JR., Plaintiff, v. D.R. BULLOCK, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:14CV1355 HEA OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is attorney Mark H. Zoole’s response to the Court’s Order of January 21, 2015, stating that no one named “Christy Ramsey” is or was a former employee of St. Francois County, Missouri, and that the last known address for this defendant is unknown to him [Doc. #51]. Because plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915, the Court is required to serve process on his behalf, provided that plaintiff has given the Court the proper service information with respect to each defendant. As such, plaintiff will be instructed to provide the Court with the full name and current address of defendant Christy Ramsey on or before March 14, 2015, so that service may be effected, as more fully set forth below. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before March 14, 2015, plaintiff shall provide the Court with the full name and address of defendant Christy Ramsey so that service may be effected. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action as to Christy Ramsey, without prejudice and without further notice. Dated this 17th day of February, 2015 ___________________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.