Sewell v. Minor, No. 2:2015cv00026 - Document 2 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

Court Description: OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's form Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis - Prisoner Cases. FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with the Courts instructions set forth above, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within (30) days of the date of this Order. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall either pa y the $400 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff submits a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, he must also submit a certified copy of his prison account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice. If the case is dismissed, the dismissal will not constitute a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Response to Court due by 5/18/2015. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 04/17/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Instructions, # 2 Prisoner Civil Rights Form, # 3 Motion IFP Form, # 4 Original Filing Form)(CLK)(forms mailed to Plaintiff)

Download PDF
Sewell v. Minor Doc. 2 Att. 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , Plaintiff, v. , Defendant, Case No. ORIGINAL FILING FORM THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND VERIFIED BY THE FILING PARTY WHEN INITIATING A NEW CASE. THIS SAME CAUSE, OR A SUBSTANTIALLY EQUIVALENT COMPLAINT, WAS PREVIOUSLY FILED IN THIS COURT AS CASE NUMBER AND ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE . THIS CAUSE IS RELATED, BUT IS NOT SUBSTANTIALLY EQUIVALENT TO ANY PREVIOUSLY FILED COMPLAINT. THE RELATED CASE NUMBER IS THAT CASE WAS ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE AND . THIS CASE MAY, THEREFORE, BE OPENED AS AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING. NEITHER THIS SAME CAUSE, NOR A SUBSTANTIALLY EQUIVALENT COMPLAINT, HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY FILED IN THIS COURT, AND THEREFORE MAY BE OPENED AS AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING. The undersigned affirms that the information provided above is true and correct. Date: Signature of Filing Party Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.