Stone Mountain Access Systems, Inc. v. Southern Recycling, L.L.C. et al, No. 1:2016cv00194 - Document 250 (S.D. Miss. 2018)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Southern Recycling, L.L.C. against Stone Mountain Access Systems, Inc. Ordered that Plaintiff Stone Mountain Access Systems, Inc. claims against Defendant Southern Recycling LLC, are dismissed with prejudice; and Ordered that this civil action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 4/6/18. (RLW)

Download PDF
Stone Mountain Access Systems, Inc. v. Southern Recycling, L.L.C. et al Doc. 250 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION STONE MOUNTAIN ACCESS SYSTEMS, INC. v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL NO. 1:16cv194-HSO-RHW SOUTHERN RECYCLING, LLC DEFENDANT FINAL JUDGMENT The claims of Plaintiff Stone Mountain Access Systems, Inc., against Defendant Southern Recycling, LLC, came on for trial before the Court and a jury on 2nd day of April, 2018, and concluded on the 6th day of April, 2018, Honorable Halil Suleyman Ozerden, United States District Judge, presiding. The issues having been duly tried and having heard all of the evidence and argument of counsel and receiving instructions of the Court, including a Verdict Form, the jury retired to consider the verdict. The jury returned upon their oaths, into open Court, a unanimous verdict, finding in favor of Defendant Southern Recycling, LLC. In accordance with the jury’s unanimous verdict, and the Court’s Orders [17] [25] [223] [243] entered in this case, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Stone Mountain Access Systems, Inc.’s claims against Defendant Southern Recycling, LLC, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Dockets.Justia.com IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 6th day of April, 2018. s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.