Williams v. Perry et al, No. 1:2015cv00397 - Document 40 (S.D. Miss. 2016)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: Plaintiff's complaint is Dismissed with Prejudice as to all claims and all defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 10/27/2016 (wld)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Williams v. Perry et al Doc. 40 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION RANDY C. WILLIAMS PLAINTIFF VERSUS CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15CV397-RHW GLORIA PERRY et al DEFENDANTS FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the requirement for filing a separate document pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a), and based on the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Defendants' motions to dismiss, the Court hereby enters its Final Judgment in the above-captioned matter. The Court finds that, by agreement of the parties, Plaintiff's complaint should be dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants Gloria Perry and Mike Hatten. The Court further finds that Plaintiff's complaint should be dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants Ronald E. Woodall, Karen Deese, and Melanie Byrd for failure to state a constitutional claim. The dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim shall count as a strike. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(g). Plaintiff is cautioned that if he acquires three or more strikes, he shall be barred from proceeding IFP unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all claims and all defendants. SO ORDERED, this the 27th day of October, 2016. /s/ Robert H. Walker ROBERT H. WALKER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
