Lund v. Precision Pipeline, LLC
Filing
21
ORDER AFFIRMING in part and OVERRULING in part the order of the Magistrate Judge. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on may 4, 2010. (HAM)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA _______________________________________________________________________ CHASTITY LUND, Plaintiff, v. ORDER PRECISION PIPELINE, LLC, Defendant. _______________________________________________________________________ John Fabian, III, FABIAN MAY & ANDERSON, 80 South Eighth Street, Suite 1285, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for plaintiff. Kurt Erickson, JACKSON LEWIS LLP, 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 3850, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for defendant. This matter came before the Court on appeal from the order of the Magistrate Judge granting plaintiff's motion to exclude certain individuals from the deposition of Chastity Lund. The Court construes plaintiff's motion to exclude witnesses from the deposition of Chastity Lund as a motion for a protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(E). See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(c)(1) (stating that Federal Rule of Evidence 615 does not apply to deposition testimony). The Court finds that plaintiff has failed to show sufficient good cause to exclude Todd Hunter from Lund's deposition, and in that respect overrules the order of the Magistrate Judge. In all other respects, the Court affirms the Magistrate Judge's order. Civil No. 10-0028 (JRT/RLE)
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED in part and OVERRULED in part.
DATED: May 4, 2010 at Minneapolis, Minnesota.
s/ John R. Tunheim JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
