Prowell v. Anoka, County of, et al.
Filing
49
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 45 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Diane Grinde are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); and 2. Plaintiff's claims against the remaining Defendants in this case are allowed to proceed at this time, without prejudice to any defenses that those Defendants may later seek to raise. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on May 18, 2010. (HAM)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
ASHAUNTI QUANTAY PROWELL, Plaintiff, v. PK, DR. ANDREW SCHOCK, M.D. TORE DETLIE, YASER ELMAMMAMY, DANIEL C. RANDA, JEFFEREY J. ROBERG, MARTIN ZADNIK, LINDA LOKEN, AND DIANE GRINDE, Defendants.
Civil No. 09-2409 (JRT/JJK) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes, dated April 20, 2010 [Docket No. 45]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Diane Grinde are dismissed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); and 2. Plaintiff's claims against the remaining Defendants in this case are allowed
to proceed at this time, without prejudice to any defenses that those Defendants may later seek to raise.
Dated: May 18, 2010 at Minneapolis, Minnesota
s/ John R. Tunheim JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
