Lange v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc. et al - Document 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: Activated Carbon-Based Hunting Clothing Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation Multidistrict Litigation No. 09-md-2059 (RHK/JJK) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Pemberton v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 09-cv-1610 (RHK/JJK); Lange v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 09-cv-1805 (RHK/JJK); and Super, et al. v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 09-cv-2036 (RHK/JJK) ORDER Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation Extending Time for Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Pemberton's Complaint and for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiffs Super, Thoune, Lange, and Pemberton's Oppositions to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, it is hereby ordered the Plaintiffs have until October 2, 2009 to respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Pemberton's Complaint. Defendants have until October 12, 2009 to respond to Plaintiffs' Lange, Super and Thoune's Oppositions to Defendants Motion to Dismiss and Defendants have until October 19, 2009 to respond to Plaintiff Pemberton's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 28, 2009 BY THE COURT: s/Richard H. Kyle Richard H. Kyle Senior United States District Judge