Jihad v. Fabian et al
Filing
124
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Denying 44 Motion for TRO filed by Hanifi Marlow Jihad; Adopting 110 Report and Recommendation, (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 4/4/2010. (PJM)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No. 09-1604(DSD/RLE) Hanifi Marlow Jihad, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner Joan Fabian, Assistant Commissioner David Crist, MCF-Stillwater Warden John King, Assoc. Warden Eddie Miles, Program Director Bruce Julson, Program Director David Reishus, Religious Cord. Gregory Skrypek, Chaplain Norris Blackmon, and Assoc. Warden Michelle Smith, Defendants. ORDER
This matter is before the court upon plaintiff's pro se objection to the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson dated March 30, 2010. In his report, the
magistrate judge recommends that plaintiff's second motion for a temporary restraining order be denied because it is not related to the claims presented in plaintiff's second amended complaint and, even if it were related, plaintiff cannot succeed on the merits of his claim. The court reviews the report and recommendation of the
magistrate judge de novo.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. After a de novo review, the
Civ. P. 72(b)(3); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b).
court determines that plaintiff has set forth no factual or legal
basis that warrants departure from the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. judges's report is Further, the court finds that the magistrate well reasoned and IT correctly IS HEREBY disposes ORDERED adopts of
plaintiff's plaintiff's
motion. objection
Accordingly, is overruled
that the
and
the
court
magistrate judge's report and recommendation [Doc. No. 110] in its entirety. Dated: May 4, 2010 s/David S. Doty David S. Doty, Judge United States District Court
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
