Darvell v. Astrue et al
Filing
14
ORDER re 13 Stipulation filed by Jerry B. Darvell, Michael J. Astrue. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is remanded, pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to the Commissioner of Social Security for a new decision and further proceed ings to properly evaluate Plaintiffs residual functional capacity, including reaching limitations imposed by the Plaintiffs reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome and specific record findings in support of each components of the residual functional capacity, and to obtain additional vocational expert testimony.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on June 5, 2009. (HAM)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA JERRY B. DARVELL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. _______________________________________________________________________ Sean Quinn, FALSANI BALMER PETERSON QUINN & BEYER, 306 Superior Street West, Suite 1200, Duluth, MN 55802, for plaintiff. Lonnie Bryan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55415, for defendants.
Pursuant to the Stipulation for Remand filed by the parties on May 19, 2009, and
Civil No. 08-6264 (JRT/JSM)
ORDER FOR REMAND
all the files, records, and proceedings in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is remanded, pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to the Commissioner of Social Security for a new decision and further proceedings to properly evaluate Plaintiff's residual functional capacity, including reaching limitations imposed by the Plaintiff's reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome and specific record findings in support of each components of the residual functional capacity, and to obtain additional vocational expert testimony. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: June 5, 2009 at Minneapolis, Minnesota
____ s/John R. Tunheim______ JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
