Prill v. Social Security Administration et al
Filing
11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this case be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Objections to R&R due by 6/23/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel on 6/4/09. (jam)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Jeffrey W. Prill, Plaintiff, v. Social Security Administration, Defendant. ___________________________________________________ 1. The complaint in this case was filed on November 14, 2008. 2. On February 2, 2009, the Government filed an answer and filed the Administrative Record [##7 and 8]. 3. On April 6, 2009, the Court issued an order [#10] granting Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file his summary judgment motion. The order also stated that no further extensions would be granted. 4. To date, Plaintiff has not filed his motion for summary judgment and memorandum in support as required by the local rules. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed for lack of prosecution. DATED: June 4, 2009. s/ Frankli L. Noel FRANKLIN L. NOEL United States Magistrate Judge REPORT & RECOMMENDATION Civil 08-6040 PAM/FLN
Pursuant to the Local Rules, any party may object to this Report and Recommendation by filing with the Clerk of Court and serving on all parties, on or before June 23, 2009, written objections which specifically identify the portions of the proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is being made, and a brief in support thereof. A party may respond to the objecting
party*s brief within ten days after service thereof. All briefs filed under the rules shall be limited to 3500 words. A judge shall make a de novo determination of those portions to which objection is made. This Report and Recommendation does not constitute an order or judgment of the District Court, and it is, therefore, not appealable to the Circuit Court of Appeals.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
