Knapp v. Vandergon et al
Filing
87
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 40 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by First Union Title and Real Estate Services, LLC, Michelle Hutton, Michael Kielty, 81 Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that First Union Title and Real Estate Services, LLC, Michael Kielty, and Michelle Huttons motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 40] is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on June 5, 2009. (HAM)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ________________________________________________________________________ RALPH T. KNAPP, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW P. VANDERGON, et al., Defendants. _______________________________________________________________________ Paul Voge, VOGE LAW OFFICE, PLLC, 21 West Superior Street, Suite 500, Duluth, MN 55802; Phillip A. Smith, LAWFARM, 4311 Normanna Road, Duluth, MN 55803, for plaintiff. Standford Hill, BASSFORD REMELE, PA, 33 South Sixth Street, Suite 3800, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for defendants First Union Title and Real Estate Services, Michael Kielty, and Michelle Hutton. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated April 23, 2009 [Docket No. 81]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that First Union Title and Real Estate Services, LLC, Michael Kielty, and Michelle Hutton's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 40] is DENIED. DATED: June 5, 2009 at Minneapolis, Minnesota. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Civil No. 08-1284 (JRT/FLN)
s/John R. Tunheim JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
