Welch v. City of Melvindale et al, No. 2:2018cv11450 - Document 48 (E.D. Mich. 2019)

Court Description: OPINION and ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment 38 39 . Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EKar)

Download PDF

Dockets.Justia.com OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [38, 39] Welch v. City of Melvindale et al Doc. 48 I. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. Id. Id. Id. See Id Id. Id. Id Id Id. Id. Id. Id Id Id. Id Id. II. Hedrick v. Western Reserve Care Sys. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. Scott v. First S. Nat’l Bank III. Monell v. Department of Social Services A. B. Matthews v. Jones Will v. Mich. Dept. of State Police Alkire v. Irving Brandon v. Holt See, e.g. Doe v. Claiborne Cty. Cavanaugh v. McBride v. Wayne Cty. Andrews C. Monell Monell See Gregory v. City of Louisville Monell Powers v. Hamilton Cty. Pub. Def. Comm’n Monell Baynes v. Cleland Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati City of St. Louis v. Praprotnik Pembaur Waters v. City of Morristown Praprotnik Arendale v. City of Memphis See Meyers v. City of Cincinnati Feliciano v. City of Cleveland Praprotnik Feliciano Indep. Sch. Dist. Jett Jett v. Dallas Mandel id. Id. Id. IV. A. Boulton v. Swanson Leary v. Daeschner 1. Garcetti v. Ceballos See Connick v. Myers Williams v. Kentucky United States v. Alvarez Williams Pickering Garcetti v. Ceballos Lane v. Franks Id Connick see also Mayhew v. Town of Smyrna Id. See, e.g. Handy-Clay v. City of Memphis Cty. Fire Prot. Dist. No. 1 Chappel v. Montgomery Lane v. Franks Pickering v. Bd. of Educ. Handy-Clay 2. Wurzelbacher v. Jones-Kelley Fritz v. Charter Twp. of Comstock See Paige v. Coyner Id. a. See, e.g. Arnold v. City of Columbus Gardenhire v. Schubert Gardenhire Id Ward v. Athens City Bd. of Educ. Powers Id. Id. See Powers Id. Id see also Paige King v. Zamiara b. See Mezibov v. Allen Wurzelbacher Bell v. Johnson Thaddeus-X v. Blatter See id. . Fritz Mattox v. City of Forest Park Haji v. Columbus City Schs. Ely v. Dearborn Heights Sch. Dist. No. 7 See Bell v. Johnson See Wurzelbacher Mezibov See Id. Mattox v. City of Forest Park See also Mezibov — Mattox 3. Rodgers v. Banks 4. Kollaritsch v. Mich. State Univ. Bd. of Trs. Cahoo v. SAS Analytics Inc. Hudson v. City of Highland Park Pearson v. Callahan Id Bazzi v. City of Dearborn McKenna v. Edgell B. Robertson v. Lucas Revis v. Meldrum Robertson Amadasu v. The Christ Hosp. Jackson v. City of Cleveland Id. Johnson v. Hills & Dales Gen. Hosp. Hull v. Cuyahoga Valley Joint Vocational Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. Jackson see also Johnson Saad v. City of Dearborn Heights see also Barrow v. City of Hillview, Kentucky Johnson see also See Briner v. City of Ontario DiLuzio v. Vill. of Yorkville Jones v. City of Youngstown C. Leary v. Daeschner 1. Quinn v. Shirey Chilingirian v. Boris Jackson v. Heh Mertik v. Blalock see also Paul v. Davis Crosby v. Univ. of Ky. Quinn Quinn See Crosby Univ. Quinn Ludwig v. Bd. of Trustees of Ferris State Quinn Brown v. City of Niota, Tenn. Id. Joelson v. United States Id. Gregory v. Hunt Chilingirian See Joelson 2. Board of Regents v. Roth see also Brown . Ludwig See Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill See Knoblauch v. City of Warren see also Goss v. Lopez Gillard v. Norris Goss Boals v. Gray 3. Loudermill Gilbert v. Homar Morrissey v. Brewer Id. Id. See See Guarino v. Brookfield Twp. Trustees see also Cremeans v. City of Roseville Wagner v. City of Memphis Bettio v. Village of Northfield See See Id. See Farhat v. Jopke see also Stillings v. Franklin Twp. Bd. of Trustees Duchesne v. Williams Farhat See id. See V. A. et seq. Id. Nicklas v. Koelling see also Odom v. Wayne Cty. Nicklas Tocco v. Piersante Randall v. Delta Charter Twp. B. Mitan v. Campbell Colista v Thomas Mitan Lawrence v. Burdi Colista Lakin v. Rund Id. See Washington C. Hope-Jackson v. Cedroni Ass’n, Inc. v. Tomblinson, Harburn Assocs., Architects & Planners Inc. Erickson’s Flooring & Supply Co. v. Tembec, Inc. Feldman v. Green Weitting v. McFeeters Erickson’s Flooring Auburn Sales, Inc. v. Cypros Trading & Shipping, Inc. See Auburn Sales Id. Erickson’s Flooring Cedroni Ass’n See VI.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.