United States of America v. Lawton
Filing
2
CONSENT JUDGMENT Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
CASE NO. 2:13-cv-13914
Plaintiff,
HON. ROBERT H. CLELAND
MAG. JUDGE PAUL J. KOMIVES
vs.
KIESHA LAWTON,
Defendant.
/
CONSENT JUDGMENT
This matter having come before the Court upon the United States' complaint;
the parties having reached an agreement; and the Court being duly advised in the
premises, now therefore
The Court finds:
That Defendant is indebted to the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) for unpaid restitution in the amount of $7,085.00;
That Defendant is currently without assets sufficient to pay the
judgment in full; and
That it is in the best interests of the parties to enter into an installment
agreement; now therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1)
Judgment shall enter against KIESHA LAWTON in the amount of
$7,085.00;
2)
Defendant is indebted $7,085.00 to the Federal Emergency Management
Fund (FEMA) for restitution. Defendant agrees to repay this debt through
monthly payments of $25.00 per month, until the entire obligation has been
paid in full;
3)
This agreement shall remain in force and effect until such time as the
judgment is paid in full;
All payments shall be by check or money order and shall be made payable to the
Federal Emergency Management Agency:
Payments shall be mailed to:
United States Attorney's Office
211 W. Fort Street -- Suite 2001
Attn: Financial Litigation Unit
Detroit, Michigan 48226
After recording that payment has been received in accordance with this agreement,
the U.S. Attorney's Office will forward payments to:
FEMA – LOCKBOX
P.O. BOX 70941
Charlotte, NC 28272-0941
Please include a notation on the check indicating “Kiesha Lawton’s restitution for
U.S. v. Linda Linseman, et al.”
4)
Defendant waives any objection to participation in the Treasury Offset
Program;
5)
Defendant shall submit complete annual financial information pursuant to
the request of the United States;
2
6)
Defendant shall maintain books and records sufficient to verify all financial
information submitted to the United States;
7)
All payments due hereunder are to be forwarded to the United States in such
a manner as to be received by the United States on or before the due date of
such payment;
8)
The payment terms established hereunder are subject to modification upon
material changes in Defendant's financial condition;
9)
In the event that the United States does not receive any payment by close of
business on the due date of the payment, due to the actions of the defendant,
or does not receive the financial information required by this agreement, the
United States may take any action deemed necessary to collect the then
outstanding balance due from Defendant;
10)
In the event the United States does not receive any payment by the close of
business on the due date of the payment, due to the actions of the defendant,
then in addition to the remedies provided in paragraph 9, interest at the
standard federal judgment rate then in effect shall begin to accrue on the
outstanding balance due on the debt;
11)
In the event that Defendant's place of employment changes or Defendant's
residence changes, then Defendant shall notify the United States of such
change within five days of the change of employment or change of
residence;
3
12)
As long as Defendant is in compliance with all the terms of this agreement,
the United States shall not garnish Defendant's wages or bank accounts.
September 17, 2013
s/Robert H. Cleland
United States District Judge
STIPULATION
The undersigned parties hereby stipulate to the entry of the above-stated
order.
BARBARA L. McQUADE
United States Attorney
s/Jacqueline M. Hotz
JACQUELINE M. HOTZ (P35219)
Assistant U. S. Attorney
211 W. Fort St., Suite 2001
Detroit, Michigan 48226
Jackie.Hotz@usdoj.gov
(313) 226-9108
Kiesha Lawton (w/consent )
KIESHA LAWTON
Defendant
4
5
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
