PATEL v. UNITED STATES et al, No. 2:2024cv00044 - Document 8 (D. Me. 2024)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 1 Emergency Pro Se Petition for Writ of Mandamus By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (mmy)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
PATEL v. UNITED STATES et al Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE RAJ K. PATEL, Plaintiff V. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:24-CV-00044-LEW ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Nivison’s Recommended Decision on Petition for Writ of Mandamus (ECF No. 5). In his Recommended Decision, Magistrate Judge Nivison recommends the summary dismissal of Plaintiff’s Petition for failure to state a claim. Although the Recommended Decision was filed on February 14, Mr. Patel has already filed two objections to the Recommeded Decision, both of which are largely unintelligible and nonsensical, as is his Petition. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision. The Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s Petition is summarily dismissed pursuant to the screening provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). SO ORDERED. Dated this 16th day of February, 2024 /s/ Lance E. Walker UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
