HART v. STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al, No. 2:2023cv00169 - Document 14 (D. Me. 2024)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE accepting 12 Report and Recommended Decision re 11 MOTION for Injunction; denying 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (clp)

Download PDF
HART v. STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ROBERT JAMES HART, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) 2:23-cv-00169-JDL ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE Robert James Hart, who is currently incarcerated as a pretrial detainee at the Androscoggin County Jail being held on state charges, seeks an injunction ordering his release from pretrial custody. Hart’s request for an injunction was made in a status report dated November 25, 2023, he submitted (ECF No. 11) in response to the Order After Review of Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 8) entered on May 17, 2023. United States Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison filed his Recommended Decision on Hart’s request for an injunction on December 6, 2023 (ECF No. 12), pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2023) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). In response, Hart filed an objection on December 26, 2023 (ECF No. 13). I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, and have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge. I concur with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 12) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED and Plaintiff’s motion for an injunction (ECF No. 11) is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated this 12th day of January, 2024. /s/ Jon D. Levy CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.