BROWN v. RIEGER et al, No. 2:2022cv00259 - Document 17 (D. Me. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION accepting 13 Report and Recommended Decision; denying 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 4 Motion for TRO; denying 8 Motion for Immediate Release; denying 11 Motion for Permanent Injunction By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
BROWN v. RIEGER et al Doc. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE SUZANNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY RIEGER, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:22-cv-00259-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on September 22, 2022, his Recommended Decision. Report and Recommended Decision on Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 13). Ms. Brown did not file any objection. The Court reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, and the Court made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and the Court concurs with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision and determines that no further proceeding is necessary. The Court AFFIRMS the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 13) and thereby DENIES Ms. Brown’s requests for emergency injunctive relief. (ECF No. 4, ECF No. 8, ECF No. 11). Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 7th day of October, 2022 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
