SHIR v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, No. 2:2022cv00122 - Document 21 (D. Me. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION accepting 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 8 Social Security Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)

Download PDF
SHIR v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Doc. 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE AJMAL S., Plaintiff, v. KILO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:22-cv-00122-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on January 25, 2023, his Recommended Decision. Report and Recommended Decision (ECF No. 18). Ajmal S. filed his objection to the Recommended Decision on February 8, 2023. Pl.’s Obj. to Report and Recommended Decision (ECF No. 19). Commissioner Kijakazi responded. On February 15, 2023, Def.’s Resp. to Pl.’s Obj. to the Report and Recommended Decision (ECF No. 20). The Court reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, and the Court made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and the Court concurs with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision and determines that no further proceeding is necessary. The Court AFFIRMS the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 18) and thereby AFFIRMS the Commissioner’s Decision. Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 27th day of March, 2023 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.