IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT et al v. US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, No. 2:2021cv00066 - Document 53 (D. Me. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION adopting 52 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 39 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (jad)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT et al v. US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT Case 2:21-cv-00066-JAW Document 53 Filed 04/12/23 Page 1 of 2 Doc. 53 PageID #: 363 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT, et. al. Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:21-cv-00066-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on March 27, 2023, his Recommended Decision. Recommended Decision on Mots. for Summ. J. (ECF No. 52). Neither party filed an objection. The Court reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, and the Court made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and the Court concurs with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision and determines that no further proceeding is necessary. The Court AFFIRMS the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 52) and thereby: • GRANTS partial summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs; • ORDERS Defendant to supplement the search of the Policy Library (a) through an electronic search using additional search terms to identify Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-00066-JAW Document 53 Filed 04/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 364 any policies, policy statements, and written guidance applicable to any detainees and detention activities (including when an individual who is presented for a “check-in” might be held) at the Scarborough facility, and (b) through the disclosure by the Boston Field Office supervisory and responsible employees of the policies they understand govern the detention or holding of individuals at the Scarborough facility; and • GRANTS summary judgment in favor of Defendant on the other issues that are the subject of the motions for summary judgment. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 12th day of April, 2023 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
