MCKENNEY v. JACQUES et al, No. 2:2019cv00223 - Document 8 (D. Me. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 6 Report and Recommendations By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (clp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
MCKENNEY v. JACQUES et al Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ROBERT McKENNEY, PLAINTIFF V. ARLENE JACQUES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 2:19-CV-223-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On August 14, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff, his Recommended Decision After Review of Complaint Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e), 1915A. The time within which to file an objection expired on August 28, 2019, and no objection has been filed.1 The Magistrate Judge had notified the plaintiff that failure to object would waive his right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 On August 27, 2019, the Post Office returned the Clerk’s Office mailing of the Recommended Decision, marked: RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED – NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD (ECF No. 7). The Clerk’s Office had used the jail address the plaintiff provided in his Complaint and other documents. He provided no other address. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
