BLAKE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, No. 2:2019cv00067 - Document 27 (D. Me. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE accepting 26 Report and Recommended Decision re: 19 SS Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
BLAKE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Doc. 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BRIAN B., Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:19-cv-00067-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision filed September 20, 2019 (ECF No. 26), the Court accepts the Recommended Decision. The Court has reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; the Court has made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and the Court concurs with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determines that no further proceeding is necessary. Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 26) of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED and AFFIRMS the Commissioner’s administrative decision. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 20th day of December, 2019 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
