USA v. WILLIAMSON, No. 2:2018mc00101 - Document 16 (D. Me. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 15 Report and Recommendations; granting 1 Petition to Enforce IRS Summons By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)

Download PDF
USA v. WILLIAMSON Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER V. ANDREW WILLIAMSON, RESPONDENT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 2:18-MC-101-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On October 4, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on Petition to Enforce IRS Summons. The time within which to file objections expired on October 18, 2018, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The court finds find that the government has complied with all statutory requirements necessary to support the administrative summons and that Andrew Williamson has unjustifiably failed to comply with the same. I GRANT the Petition and ORDER Andrew Williamson, with respect to the relevant summons tax periods, to produce the requested documents (i.e., the documents described in the summons) to IRS Revenue Officer Meredith West, or any other officer of the IRS, at the office of the IRS, 220 Maine Mall Road, South Portland, Dockets.Justia.com Maine 04106, within seven (7) days of this Order. I caution Andrew Williamson that failure to comply with the Court’s Order within the deadline set in the Order could result in a finding that he is in contempt of court and he could be subject to arrest for purposes of a compulsory hearing pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7604(b). SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.