SALCEDO v. DUBOIS et al, No. 2:2018cv00092 - Document 14 (D. Me. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 12 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
SALCEDO v. DUBOIS et al Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE FRANKLIN J. SALCEDO, PLAINTIFF V. WILLIAM KING, York County Jail Sheriff, ET AL., DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 2:18-CV-92-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On April 11, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff, his Recommended Decision After Screening Complaint Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e), 1915A. The plaintiff filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on April 23, 2018, but the contents of the objection provide no ground adequate to reject the Recommended Decision. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. PREJUDICE The plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT to the plaintiff’s ability to assert his state law claim in state court and/or to assert an actionable federal claim within this Court’s jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 8TH DAY OF MAY, 2018 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
