RUFFIN v. HINKLEY et al, No. 2:2017cv00151 - Document 34 (D. Me. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 33 Report and Recommendations; granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (jib)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
RUFFIN v. HINKLEY et al Doc. 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE DANIEL ONEIL RUFFIN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN HINKLEY, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket no. 2:17-cv-151-NT ) ) ) ) ) ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On June 21, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 33). The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. /s/ Nancy Torresen United States Chief District Judge Dated this 16th day of July, 2018. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
