DUDLEY v. FOSTER et al, No. 2:2014cv00291 - Document 7 (D. Me. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 4 Report and Recommendations filed by JOEL DUDLEY Denying as moot 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (dfr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
DUDLEY v. FOSTER et al Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JOEL DUDLEY, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTINE FOSTER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2:14-cv-00291-NT ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on July 28, 2014 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 4). The Plaintiff filed a letter with the Court on September 23, 2014 (ECF No. 6), which the Court views as an Objection to the Recommended Decision.1 I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. The Recommended Decision in this case was written by Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison. In his letter to the Court, Mr. Dudley mistakenly thought the Recommended Decision was written by United States Judge John Levy. Judge Levy merely recused himself from acting on this case. 1 Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff s complaint be DISMISSED, and the Plaintiff s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as MOOT. SO ORDERED. /s/ Nancy Torresen UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 1st day of October, 2014. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
