FLORES v. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, US DEPARTMENT et al, No. 2:2012cv00189 - Document 6 (D. Me. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 4 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ERIC FLORES, PLAINTIFF v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 2:12-CV-189-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On July 23, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff, his Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections expired on August 9, 2012, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the plaintiff that failure to object would waive his right to de novo review and appeal. After the Recommended Decision was mailed to the plaintiff at the address he gave in his Complaint, it was returned with a U.S. Postal Service sticker dated August 4, 2012, that reads: Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward (ECF No. 5). The Clerk s Office has no other address for the plaintiff. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Complaint is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2012 /s/D. Brock Hornby D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
