ALEXANDER v. FIRST WIND ENERGY LLC et al, No. 2:2011cv00364 - Document 52 (D. Me. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THERECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE- 51 Report and Recommended Decision By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (cef)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JULIE BAIRD ALEXANDER, Plaintiff v. FIRST WIND ENERGY LLC, et als., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:11-cv-364-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (Docket No. 51) filed February 28, 2012, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 2) is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff s Motion to Amend Complaint (Docket No. 35) is DENIED; 3. Defendant First Wind Energy LLC s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 18) is GRANTED; 4. Defendant Central Maine Power Company s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 21) is GRANTED; 5. Defendant Rumford Board of Selectmen s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 30) is GRANTED; 6. Defendant Central Maine Power Company s Motion for a More Definite Statement (Docket No. 21) is terminated as no further action is needed. 7. Plaintiff s Complaint (Docket No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. _/s/ George Z. Singal __ United States District Judge Dated this 21st day of March, 2012.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
