SPRAGUE CHADBROWN v. COLES, No. 2:2011cv00145 - Document 68 (D. Me. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 63 Report and Recommendations re 16 Motion to Dismiss By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine TERAH SPRAGUE CHADBROWN, Plaintiff v. JAMES REED COLES, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2:11-145-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on November 2, 2011, her Recommended Decision (Docket No. 63). Plaintiff filed her Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 66) on November 23, 2011. Defendant filed his Response to Plaintiff s Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 67) on December 9, 2011. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff s complaint (Docket No. 1) is DISMISSED because the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against Defendant fail to state a claim and Plaintiff has likewise failed to plead tenable 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and § 1985 conspiracy claims against Defendant. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 13th day of December, 2011.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.