SMITH v. FAIRBANK FARMS INC et al, No. 2:2010cv00060 - Document 199 (D. Me. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: denying 91 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 92 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying ; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 182 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (mjlt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine ALICE SMITH, Plaintiff v. FAIRBANK FARMS, INC., et al., Defendants and ThirdParty Plaintiffs v. GREATER OMAHA PACKING COMPANY, INC., Third-Party Defendant ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:10-cv-60-GZS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 31, 2011, his Recommended Decision (Docket No. 182). Third-Party Defendant Greater Omaha Packing Company, Inc. filed its Objection to the Recommended Decision on Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 189) on June 17, 2011. Third-Party Defendant Greater Omaha Packing Company, Inc. filed its Objection to the Recommended Decision on Motion to Exclude Expert Opinion (Docket No. 191) on June 17, 2011. Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs Fairbank Farms, Inc., et al filed its Response to ThirdParty Defendant s Objections to the Recommended Decision on Motion to Exclude Expert Opinion (Docket No. 196) on July 1, 2011. Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs Fairbank Farms, Inc., et al filed its Response to Third-Party Defendant s Objections to the Recommended Decision on Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 198) on July 1, 2011. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 91) filed by Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs Fairbank Farms, Inc., et al is DENIED. 3. It is ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 92) filed by Third-Party Defendant Greater Omaha Packing Company, Inc. is DENIED. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 7th day of July, 2011.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
