BURTIC v. KEYBANK NA, No. 2:2008cv00381 - Document 7 (D. Me. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER ON THE RECOMMENDED DECISION & PENDING MOTIONS mooting 3 Motion for Order; adopting 6 Report and Recommendations and Dismissing Complaint. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MARTIAN BURTIC, Plaintiff, v. KEYBANK NA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 08-381-P-S ORDER ON THE RECOMMENDED DECISION & PENDING MOTIONS No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (Docket No. 6), filed April 3, 2009, the Recommended Decision is hereby AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff s Complaint (Docket No. 1) is DISMISSED for failure to complete the necessary paperwork to allow the Marshal to make service on KeyBank and because this action does not state any claim cognizable in this Court. In light of this dismissal, Plaintiff s Amended Motion for Relief (Docket No. 3) is MOOT. SO ORDERED. __ _/s/ George Z. Singal United States District Judge Dated this 23rd day of April, 2008.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
