RICHARDSON v. FRIENDLY ICE CREAM CORPORATION et al, No. 2:2007cv00216 - Document 54 (D. Me. 2008)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 49 Report and Recommendations; GRANTING 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine KATHARINE RICHARDSON, Plaintiff v. FRIENDLY ICE CREAM CORPORATION, et al, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 07-216-P-S ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on September 19, 2008, his Recommended Decision (Docket No. 49). Plaintiff filed her Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 52) on October 3, 2008. Defendant filed its Response to Plaintiff s Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 53) on October 23, 2008. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 26) is GRANTED. 3. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant s Motion to Exclude certain testimony from Dr. Crowe (Docket No. 30) is MOOT for the purposes of consideration of the motion for summary judgment. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ Chief U.S. District Judge Dated: October 29, 2008
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
