R C et al v. YORK SCHOOL DEPARTMENT, No. 2:2007cv00177 - Document 46 (D. Me. 2008)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 34 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE R.C. and E.P., as parents and next friends of J.C., a minor, Plaintiffs, v. YORK SCHOOL DEPARTMENT, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. 07-cv-177-P-S ) ) ) ) ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on September 25, 2008, his Recommended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Docket # 34) in this IDEA dispute. Plaintiffs filed their Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket # 37) on October 24, 2008. Defendant filed its Response to Plaintiffs Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket # 44) on November 14, 2008. The Court held oral argument on December 4, 2008. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is ORDERED that judgment be entered against Plaintiffs and for Defendant, York School Department. /s/ George Z. Singal Chief U.S. District Judge Dated: December 5, 2008
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
