JORDAN v. KANE, No. 1:2023cv00311 - Document 4 (D. Me. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (mmy)

Download PDF
JORDAN v. KANE Doc. 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MARK R. JORDAN, Petitioner, v. SCOTT KANE, Respondent ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:23-cv-00311-LEW ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On August 31, 2023, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision After Preliminary Review (ECF No. 2). The Petitioner filed an Objection to the Recommended Decision on September 15, 2023. Through his Objection, Petitioner seeks to supplement his petition to meet the Magistrate Judge’s observation that he has failed to allege facts depicting the kind of extraordinary circumstances necessary to overcome the presumption in favor of abstention pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). Based on my review, Petitioner’s supplemental argument and materials demonstrate that he may have a basis to pursue a motion to suppress evidence in state court, but not that there are extraordinary circumstances to suggest that he will not have the opportunity to do so within a reasonable time. Petitioner’s supplemetal materials, in other words, do not undermine the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Dockets.Justia.com I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision and the Objection, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. The motion for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DENIED and DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing. It is further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will issue from this Court because the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). SO ORDERED. Dated this 20th day of October, 2023. /s/ Lance E. Walker UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.