LEE v. RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, No. 1:2022cv00258 - Document 9 (D. Me. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE accepting 7 Report and Recommended Decision, dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by ADAM DAVID LEE. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
LEE v. RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER Doc. 9 Case 1:22-cv-00258-JAW Document 9 Filed 11/14/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 66 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ADAM DAVID LEE, v. RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:22-cv-00258-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision filed October 19, 2022 (ECF No. 7), the Court accepts the Recommended Decision. The Court has reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision and concurs with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 7) of the Magistrate Judge be and hereby is AFFIRMED, and the Court DISMISSES the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1). The Court denies a certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:22-cv-00258-JAW Document 9 Filed 11/14/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 67 SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 14th day of November, 2022 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
