PRESCOTT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, No. 1:2021cv00210 - Document 25 (D. Me. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION accepting 17 Report and Recommended Decision re: 11 Social Security Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
PRESCOTT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Case 1:21-cv-00210-JAW Document 25 Filed 09/21/22 Page 1 of 2 Doc. 25 PageID #: 1208 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE PATRICIA P., Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:21-cv-00210-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on July 28, 2022, her Recommended Decision (ECF No. 17). The Plaintiff filed a motion to amend the Recommended Decision on August 2, 2022 (ECF No. 18), the Government filed its response in opposition on August 12, 2022 (ECF No. 20), and then the Plaintiff filed a reply on August 19, 2022 (ECF No. 21). On August 23, 2022, the Magistrate Judge granted the Plaintiff’s motion to amend (ECF No. 22). Then, on September 2, 2022, the Government filed its objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 23), and on September 16, 2022, the Plaintiff filed her response to the objection (ECF No. 24). The Court reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; the Court made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and the Court concurs with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, as amended, and determines the Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:21-cv-00210-JAW Document 25 Filed 09/21/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1209 Commissioner’s decision should be vacated and the matter remanded for further proceedings consistent with this decision and the Recommended Decision, including limiting review on remand to the period from May 2, 2018, to November 3, 2020. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 17) be and hereby is AFFIRMED as amended by ECF No. 22. 2. It is further ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision be and hereby is VACATED and the matter REMANDED for further proceedings. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 21st day of September, 2022 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
