BRAYMAN v. PORTER et al, No. 1:2020cv00169 - Document 73 (D. Me. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION terminating 69 Order to Show Cause ; accepting 72 Report and Recommended Decision; dismissing without prejudice 1 Complaint By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
BRAYMAN v. PORTER et al Doc. 73 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE WADE DREW BRAYMAN, Plaintiff, v. RAYMOND PORTER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:20-cv-00169-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on September 8, 2022, his Recommended Decision. Report and Recommended Decision (ECF No. 72). Mr. Brayman did not file any objection. The Court reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, and the Court made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and the Court concurs with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision and determines that no further proceeding is necessary. The Court AFFIRMS the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 72) and thereby DISMISSES without prejudice the Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1). Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 3rd day of October, 2022 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
