CAIN v. TZOVARRAS et al, No. 1:2020cv00070 - Document 13 (D. Me. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE accepting 11 Report and Recommended Decision By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CAIN v. TZOVARRAS et al Doc. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE DONALD CAIN Plaintiff, v. HUNTER TZOVARRAS, et al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:20-cv-00070-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, filed June 1, 2020 (ECF No. 11), the Recommended Decision is accepted. The Court has reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; the Court has made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and the Court concurs with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Complaint as to Defendant Bryan Kirsch be and hereby is DISMISSED. Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 2nd day of July, 2020 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
