FOLEY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, No. 1:2018cv00469 - Document 31 (D. Me. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 . By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)

Download PDF
FOLEY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Doc. 31 Case 1:18-cv-00469-GZS Document 31 Filed 08/17/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 823 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine JULIANNE M. F., Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner, Of Social Security, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:18-cv-00469-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on July 15, 2020, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 25). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 27) on July 29, 2020. Defendant filed its Response to Plaintiff’s Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 30) on August 12, 2020. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to file an untimely motion for award of attorney’s fees (ECF No. 21) is hereby DENIED. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 17th day of August, 2020. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.