GLADU v. WALTZ et al, No. 1:2018cv00275 - Document 296 (D. Me. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 286 . By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
GLADU v. WALTZ et al Doc. 296 Case 1:18-cv-00275-GZS Document 296 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1033 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine NICHOLAS A. GLADU, Plaintiff, v. GARY WALTZ, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:18-cv-00275-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on October 30, 2020, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 286). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 290) on November 20, 2020. Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiff’s Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 295) on December 14, 2020. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 197) is hereby GRANTED and that judgment in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is entered. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this day of December, 2020. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
