LICATA v. STATE OF MAINE, No. 1:2018cv00045 - Document 21 (D. Me. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 . No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
LICATA v. STATE OF MAINE Doc. 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ANGELO B. LICATA, Petitioner, v. STATE OF MAINE, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:18-cv-45-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 20) filed June 5, 2018, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED. An evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. It is ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for habeas relief under U.S.C. § 2255 is hereby DISMISSED. A certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases is denied because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). _/s/ George Z. Singal __ United States District Judge Dated this 28th day of June, 2018. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
