HEINEMANN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al, No. 1:2016cv00460 - Document 13 (D. Me. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 12 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib) Modified on 11/2/2016 to correct the Date Filed (jib).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
HEINEMANN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al Doc. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE THEODORE HEINEMANN, PLAINTIFF V. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 1:16-CV-460-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On October 14, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff, his Recommended Decision After Screening Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The time within which to file objections expired on October 31, 2016, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the plaintiff that failure to object would waive his right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED, except for the plaintiff’s challenge to the Social Security Administration’s decision to collect from plaintiff the overpayment of benefits. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
