WILLIAMS v. WALDO COUNTY MAINE DEPUTY MERL REED et al, No. 1:2016cv00211 - Document 33 (D. Me. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE, adopting 32 Report and Recommended Decision; denying 18 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
WILLIAMS v. WALDO COUNTY MAINE DEPUTY MERL REED et al Doc. 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BRADLEY PAUL WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF V. WALDO COUNTY MAINE DEPUTY MERL REED AND BELFAST MAINE POLICE CHIEF MIKE McFADDEN, DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 1:16-CV-211-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On November 8, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The time within which to file objections expired on November 25, 2016, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
