DREWRY v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al, No. 1:2016cv00075 - Document 155 (D. Me. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 143 and granting the 87 Second Motion for Summary Judgment. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine BRANDON DREWRY, Plaintiff v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:16-cv-00075-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on November 13, 2017, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 143). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 152) on January 11, 2018. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery (ECF No. 97) is hereby DENIED. 3. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 87) is hereby GRANTED. 4. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants Abbott, Ross, Staples, Averill and Court. 5. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion to Stay (ECF No. 153) is MOOT. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 25th day of January, 2018.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
