COUSINS et al v. HIGGINS et al, No. 1:2014cv00515 - Document 89 (D. Me. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 85 Report and Recommendations, 77 Motion for Summary Judgment By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
COUSINS et al v. HIGGINS et al Doc. 89 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ROBERT L. COUSINS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS V. KEITH HIGGINS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 1:14-CV-515-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On June 28, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The plaintiffs filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on July 12, 2018. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The defendants’ amended motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and judgment is ENTERED for the defendants’ on all remaining claims. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2018 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
